New Page 1

If enclosed chargings (ions) are in asymmetrical electric field (asymmetrical in space and in time), law of conversation of impulse isn`t valid (in this case law of conversation of energy is also invalid). This is dr. Egely György`s assertion, and following experiments proves, it`s true!

In my case electric field is asymmetrical in 3D by construction, and in time by corona discharges (for certain it exist a better solution from this). Some my devices works without corona discharges too.

We can use this "hole" in physics for a revolutionary new propulsion in space, since demand only energy, not material to work. Energy may been convey in very high value, material not!

In my research i deal with direct transformation electrical energy to mechanical energy. As starting point i used Thomas Browns 2,949,550 serial number patent. I have surprising perceptions:

In several electrostatic systems it's emergenced "reactionless force". It's mean than the anode and the catode doesn't attractive each other with equal force, but one force is greater.

I call the difference of two forces as reactionless force. The unbalanced forces resulting than for the total system will report an force that try to move the system on one direction. That is mayhaps Biefeld Brown effect, we know for this effect a long since, but it is not proved yet. This effect exist in perfect vacuum too, see:

Mr. William B. Stein at Purdue University measured thrust of lifter in perfect vacuum.

I used this phenomenon to made 3 similar propulsion engines, in following methodes:

1. I fixed up from eatch other paralell an insulated wire and an uninsulated flimsy wire. To the flimsy wire it's may to use an periphery with edge. On charged up to high voltage, it's will come forward reactionless force from the insulated electrode to the uninsulated, flimsy wire. This force try to move the full system (figure 1 and figure 2). I marked the reactionless force with Fx.

2. I generated this force using insulated surface instead of insulated wire. In this case the reactionless force try also to move the system from the insulated electrode to the not insulated, flimsy wire.

3. Hermetically closing the system, i made also an reactionless force engines, but in this case the force was something smaller (figure 3). In that case we must remove ions from hermetically closed jar, creating opposite charged ions outside of the jar. That we can reach to connecting opposite pole of supply to fixed thin wires (outside of drive).

The hermetically closing the system prove than the applicant force is reactionless force, since the medium around the electrodes can't move. In this case i used conductive surface about the thin wire, that way was applicanted the biggest reactionless force.

· It's depend from the polarity of the voltage: The force is greater when the flimsy wire is positive. With opposing polarity the force still try to move the system to the direction of the flimsy wire, but in this case it's smaller. In some systems, when the flimsy wire is negative, the force will round and than try to move the system from the flimsy wire to the insulated electrode. At hermeticalli closed systems the force try to move system to the direction of pozitive electrodes.

· With expansion the distance (X) of the electrodes, to some value will the reactionless force to grow, than will to decrease. On 50kV the optimal distance of the electrodes is 12cm.

· Of the liking current throu the isolation, the force will decreas, in some case it's will round to the opposing way. It's maximal at zero current. This phenomenon i experienced in my experiments.

· If the unatached ending of the flimsy wires standing to the oppozite direction from the insulated electrode, the reactionless force will round to the opposite way.

· The insulated wire can be uninsulated in an surrounding insulator surface (figure 4). It's mean than if we put one of the uninsulated flimsy wires in an insulator surface, the reactionless force will try to move the system to the unattached wire.

· The reactionless force is proportional with square of the voltage. I define that with experiments.

· With increasing f1/f2 the force will increas. So slighter is f2 that will be greater the reactionless force. For example on 50kV, f1=1mm, f2=0,15mm, f3=2mm.

· The system can be hermetically closed. In this case we must use conductive surface of the direction from the uninsulated flimsy wire. On other directions we can use insulated surfacis (figure 3). At this system we must remove ions inside closed drive, making opposite charged ions outside of drive. In vacuum this is not important.

The vital differenc of this system and the Thomas Browns system is than i used insulated electrodes instead of uninsulated conductive surfacis. In this case the system can be defensed from touching the high voltage (figure 5).

The reactionless force raise a question in law of conversation of energy. With constant invested power (it can support to zero becouse of zero current) the system in vacuum will be constant pick up speed. Its kinetic energy will be decreas with square of time. Its will became the time when the kinetic energy of the moving system will be greater than the invested energy. The law of conversation of energy can be explained only with zero point energy. The kinetic energy of the system is proportionate with the cubage of the passed space.

Pictures of my latest, fast rotating, hermeticalli closed and full insulated bipolar system:

The picture of the device from my previous experiments (In dielectric with high K, the thrust will significantly increasing):

· Propulsion of spaceships, satelites. Its will be never emptied the fuel bunker.

· Propulsion of aircrafts. On enough high voltage the system can pick up an aircraft. And the voltage can be enought high becouse of the insulated electrode.

· Generating electricity. In vacuum, quicly rotating system can have greater kinetic energy than the invested energy. We can use the difference for generating electricity.

The next videos are interesting becouse instead of flimsy wire, i used lamp. In this case system can't ionised air, but even so it's come forward the reactionless force. This prove then the system will be at work even so in vacuum.

In the next system the unatached ending of the flimsy wires standing to the oppozite direction from the insulated electrodes. In this case the reactionless force is round to the opposite way.

The next videos are hermetically closed and from outside insulated rotating systems. This systems are an other argument for reactionless force, since in the hermetically closed system the medium can't move, its can't be ionic-wind effect.

Density of the field energy in space is constant. This energy consist of electro-magnetic and of zero point energy. Since in this high voltage systems density of electro-magnetic energy is something higher at the ribs of the uninsulated flimsy wire than of environment, zero point energy in this place is lower. Higher density of zero point energy try to move the system through the flimsy wire to the direction of lower density zero point energy. The experimental finded equation for the reactionless force:

On next picture i will present how i imagined a field propulsion aircraft (spacecraft):

This aircraft is drived at 3 high voltage generators. This generators was supervised by computer. It's reported 3 reactionless forces, at wich the aircraft can easy manoeuvre. The estimated value of high voltage is several MV, but becouse of zero current, the power can be small.

I try to find an investitor for the international patenting this system, also for keep on doing and made a system which be fly. If the system will be soar, it's will be fly into the space becouse this efect work even so in vacuum.